The Story of…Sending E-waste to Electronics CEOs’ Homes
If you haven’t watched it yet, below is the latest installment in the Story of Stuff Project: The Story of Electronics.
In essence, the film is a straightforward critique of the electronics industry and how these goods are currently “designed for the dump,” not being easily repairable and not having components that can be used in future designs. Annie gives a great example of phone chargers, which could easily be based on a uniform design so that you can use the same cord for all of your products, even if you update your phone.
Of course, Annie then draws attention to the ecological and health repercussions of this design failure, drawing attention to the toxic fumes that manufacturers, consumers, and recyclers of electronics all inhale. She concludes with some suggestions for action, encouraging people to advocate for improved regulation of this sector and to demand “stronger laws on toxic chemicals, and banning e-waste exports,” particularly to developing countries. (Of course, we’re also toxifying workers who recycle e-waste right here in the U.S.—like the prisoners who are forced to recycle e-waste at these 10 federal prisons—so it would be nice if Annie could expand her suggestion to protect recyclers’ rights regardless of their location.)
But ultimately, these proposals are pretty par for the course. And while they are essential steps (and have been advocated for by The Story of Electronics partner Electronics Takeback Coalition and others, they probably won’t be enough to get the job done (especially as demand for these goods is artificially stimulated through marketing and so the sales of gadgets grow bigger every year).
That’s why I got so excited when I heard Annie’s very interesting proposal—the gem of the film in my opinion. Annie asks, what if we sent our electronics waste “to the CEOs that made it?” While I’m sure Annie didn’t mean that literally, I think it’s a brilliant idea. Imagine hundreds of pounds of e-waste arriving at the homes of Steve Jobs, Michael Dell, Léo Apotheker of HP, and other big-brand CEOs. At the very least they (or their domestic staff more likely) would have to cart the stuff to their corporate facilities so that they can ship them to an e-cycler, which should generate some good media attention (and would feel really good, too). At best, however, this might actually have the effect that Annie suggests, where CEOs would finally start becoming strong advocates for redesigning their products.
With that said, I want to start the organizing process. A quick search provided me with Steve Jobs’ address, so when your next iPod, iPhone, iPad, MacBook, or whatever else that Apple made breaks, please send it to:
Steve Jobs
2101 Waverley Street
Palo Alto, CA 94301
(And yes this is really his home—confirm that here.)
And if you’re a Dell user send your old computer junk to:
Michael Dell
3501 Cassava Drive
Austin, TX 78746
This one took a lot more work to find but you can check it out here.
Better yet, do a “broken-electronics” drive in your community or send out an email to your friends and ship a really big box all at once, which I imagine would have a much bigger impact—especially if you call a press conference at the post office when you send it off (and remember to support the post office, not UPS or FedEx).
Or even better than that, let’s coordinate a Christmas bombardment, timing these many community drives for early December, so that a barrage of e-waste packages arrives just in time for Christmas. It isn’t lumps of coal we’re sending—it’s much, much worse. That gives us a couple of weeks to gather the goods (or the “not-so-goods” more accurately) and ship them off to Steve Jobs and others.
If you have other CEO home addresses, please post them in the comments. And please share this idea with local environmental groups in your area and others you know who would be interested (and send me a note—if this idea inspires others, I’m happy to coordinate the progress of community e-waste drives here on Transforming Cultures or another website). This could be a very effective means of accelerating the design changes that the electronics industry so urgently needs (not to mention a good way to clean out the e-junk from your closets and garages).
Let the barrage begin!




[...] The Story of…Sending E-waste to Electronics CEOs’ Homes WorldWatch Blogs Transforming Cultures 2010-11-11 [...]
Hi there. I have just showed “The story of electronics” to my Economics students today. Great job (just like all the previous ones). Everyone chuckled at your suggestion to dump the waste at the CEOs’ backyards. Anyway, I find it useful to show films like these to the students of Economics just to make them think (whatever some critics may say or whatever polemics may ensue). In any case, these films are much better ways to force people to think than tons and tons of boring academic textbooks…
Sincerely
Vytenis Koncius
Siauliai University, Lithuania
Great idea, what you suggest. But the first principle should always be, think before you buy. Do you really need it? Why are you buying it? Do you need to upgrade right now, or can you wait?
Part II — Consumers need to regain the understand earlier generations had: Buy quality, even at a higher price.
It’s better for both the environment and, in the long run, for the pocketbook.
The consumers who purchase the electronics completely voluntary (the CEO didn’t hold a gun to their head) should be responsible for disposing of them. It is ridiclous concept to send it to the home of a CEO’s. The CEO didn’t make anyone purchase these products, they only make them available.
Take responsibility for your own decisions.
The manufacturing design principle discussed here is ‘planned obsolescence’ and it permeates our ENTIRE global economy. In the capitalist free market system, selling a product that is guaranteed to need replacement in a matter of years or months is an excellent business strategy that helps companies turn a profit. Waste = profit in this model. If manufacturers used the best possible parts and the best possible designs, they’d be eliminating repeat customers, which is unacceptable in our current economic model.
We all know what the result of planned obsolescence is for our environment – the question is, when are people going to start waking up to the fact that our entire economic model of production and consumption is destroying the planet? I urge you all to visit the The Zeitgeist Movement’s website for a real discussion of the alternatives to this disastrous experiment in social and economic order that spawns such perverse principles as planned obsolescence.